(a) The Charterers will not directly or indirectly suffer, nor permit to be continued, any lien, any encumbrance, or any rights of any kind whatsoever over the Vessel in respect of the supply of bunkers.
(b) The Charterers shall:
(i) prior to ordering any bunkers for the Vessel inform the sellers of the bunkers in writing (the “Non-Lien Notice”) that the bunkers to be supplied to the Vessel are solely for the Charterers’ account, and that neither the Vessel, the Owners nor the Master is a party to the bunker supply contract and no lien, encumbrance or any rights shall arise on the Vessel; and
(ii) after ordering bunkers inform the Owners in writing of the name and contact details of the sellers of the bunkers and, if the Owners so request, provide Owners with a copy of the Non-Lien Notice.
(c) If the Charterers fail to comply with sub-clause (b)(ii), the Master shall be entitled to refuse to allow the bunkers to be supplied to the Vessel and if the Master so refuses hire shall continue to accrue and any extra expenses arising out of or in connection with such refusal shall be for the Charterers' account.
(d) If in compliance with any of the provisions of this Clause, anything is done or not done, such shall not be deemed a deviation, but shall be considered as due fulfillment of this Charter Party by the Owners.
(e) As soon as possible after the due date of payment for bunkers for each supply made during the charter period, the Charterers shall provide the Owners with written evidence or acknowledgement of payment from the bunker sellers.
(f) The Charterers shall procure that this Clause shall be incorporated into all sub-time charters.
Charterers’ failure to pay for bunkers supplied to a vessel on time charter is likely to have severe implications for owners who, although not party to the arrangements, may nevertheless find their vessel arrested, perhaps weeks or months later, for the outstanding debt. Owners are then faced with the prospect of having to arrange security for release and possibly having to settle the claim themselves, often on top of other losses sustained when a financially weak charterer has defaulted on hire. Owners will probably find themselves responsible for most of the costs incurred since FD&D and P&I cover will normally be limited only to certain legal fees.
In practical terms, time charterers contract with a counterparty seller who will often sub-contract through several layers of traders to the final physical supplier who arrives alongside the vessel with the bunker barge. The contractual relationship is, therefore, between the time charterer and the seller. The owner is not party to the contract and therefore has no liability to the seller. Nevertheless, as the vessel is usually seen as an easy and tangible object on which to secure a claim without regard to party liability, an express term purporting to make delivery conditional on a lien over the vessel is often inserted in bunker delivery notes. Owners invariably require their master to stamp or otherwise endorse a delivery note to the effect that the bunkers are being supplied for the account and on the credit of the charterers. However, this is likely to be rejected by physical suppliers and in some jurisdictions may be viewed as a post contractual endorsement with no protective value for owners.
Under most time charters, charterers are responsible for the supply of and payment for bunkers. Whether or not a bunker supplier can exercise a lien in the event of charterer default on payment will depend on the contractual provisions and may also be fact dependent. Under English law and the majority of common law jurisdictions, the supply of bunkers gives rise to a statutory lien but if, as will be normally be the case, suppliers cannot show that owners were a party to the bunker contract, the claim will not succeed. In the US, specific steps must be taken if owners are to be protected against the presumption that time charterers can bind a vessel for bunker purchases.
Arrangements helpful to suppliers may similarly be available in jurisdictions where time charterers are perceived to have implied authority to bind owners and, as a result, bunker suppliers are able to place a lien on a vessel.
The objective of the Bunker Non-Lien Clause is to provide a pre-emptive mechanism to protect owners by requiring time charterers to inform their counterparty, the seller, at the outset that bunkers ordered are being supplied for their account and that no lien can be placed over the vessel. (A suggested form of words for an accompanying Bunker Pre-order Non-Lien Notice is set out at the end of these notes).
The provision might not prevent determined interests in a seller chain from taking action to arrest a vessel (often in a carefully chosen jurisdiction) for security in the event of charterer default on payment. However, the clause and as appropriate a copy of time charterers’ notice to sellers, could be adduced in evidence by owners in such event or used in any later arbitration or court proceedings to determine the merits of bunker sellers’ claim.
Contractual arrangements for the supply and obligation to pay for bunkers are a contentious area of law and practice but the new provision represents a step towards creating a regime to protect the interests of innocent parties. It will not necessarily work in all jurisdictions or circumstances but aims to encourage charterers to accept their responsibilities. Refusal to agree its inclusion in a contract might give rise to concerns about the party’s financial standing and reliability.
BIMCO is grateful to the following members for their work in developing the new clause:
Jean-Pierre Laffaye, Cetragpa, (Chairman) (Owner)
Leonidas Los, Tri-Marine Shipping Co (Owner)
Georg Scheel, Nordisk (Club)
Barry Ayliffe, North of England P&I Association (Club)
Jonathan Young, Cargill (Charterer)
Sub-clause (a) sets out charterers’ obligation not to incur any lien over the vessel in relation to
the supply of bunkers;
Sub-clause (b) contains charterers’ central obligations:
o Sub-paragraph (i) prior to ordering bunkers, to provide sellers with a written Non-Lien Notice stating that the bunkers are for charterers’ account, that the vessel, owners or
master are not a party thereto and that no lien or other encumbrance arises on the vessel;
o Sub-paragraph (ii) after ordering bunkers, to provide owners with details of sellers. In addition, owners have a discretionary right to ask for a copy of the Non-Lien Notice. This option will enable owners to decide, on a case by case basis, whether they need the added security of evidence to confirm that charterers have fulfilled their obligation to inform bunker suppliers of the position;
Sub-clause (c) in default of charterers complying with their obligations in sub-clause (b)(ii) to provide owners with sellers’ details and, if requested, a copy of the Non-Lien Notice, the master can refuse to accept delivery of bunkers. Any resulting costs are for charterers’ account and the vessel remains on hire;
Sub-clause (d) is a standard provision stating that if the owners, by complying with the Bunker Non-Lien Clause, do or omit doing something, that will not be considered to be a breach of the charter party. The provision refers specifically to the word “deviation” because if the vessel has cargo on board and is delayed while issues concerning the bunkers are resolved, it might be argued that there is a deviation, and additional expenses may be incurred, for example, in respect of bills of lading holders. Subclause (d) protects the owners in such situations.
Sub-clause (e) requires charterers to provide owners with confirmation of payments made for bunkers during the charter period; and
Sub-clause (f) this is the standard incorporation provision.
SUGGESTED FORM OF WORDS
Bunker Pre-order Non-Lien Notice
Originally published in BIMCO Special Circular No. 4, 27 November 2014 - Bunker Non-Lien Clause for Time Charter Parties
The one-stop digital shop for all the standard maritime contracts and clauses you’ll ever need.
Veritas Petroleum Services (VPS) publish regular Bunker Alerts based entirely on fuel samples. The bunker samples are analysed by VPS whenever a short-term quality issue is identified in a specific port or region.
BIMCO providing information and guidance relating to fumigation of cargoes that are shipped under the IMSBC Code, the Grain Code and the IMDG Code.
From time to time, BIMCO is approached by members enquiring about responsibility for the cleaning of a ship’s underwater parts when it has been idle at a port for a long time pursuant to the orders of the time charterers.
New regulation from the International Maritime Organization (IMO), which will require existing ships to reduce carbon emissions, is due to enter into force in just under one year. As compliance will benefit to a large extent from co-operation between shipowners and charterers, BIMCO has developed a new clause to address the changes.
From 1 September 2021, ship owners and operators calling at ports in Sierra Leone risk penalties of up to USD 15,000 if they carry fuel with a sulphur content exceeding 0.5 percent. Ships or members experiencing problems related to enforcement of MARPOL Annex V or unavailability of compliant fuel are encouraged to inform BIMCO via email firstname.lastname@example.org with “IMO 2020” in the subject field.
BIMCO's Holiday Calendar covers general holidays in over 150 countries, plus local holidays and working hours in more than 680 ports around the world.
For general guidance and information on cargo-related queries.