MINREPCON 2018 is a standard contract for minor afloat repairs at a commercial berth or anchorage. It is not meant to be an alternative to REPAIRCON 2018, which is the recommended contract for contracting with ship repairers or major sub-contractors. MINREPCON 2018 is intended to be used by shipowners to conclude written contracts with individuals or sub-contractors performing minor repairs which would normally be reluctant to read or sign a longer contract, such as REPAIRCON 2018. It should be noted that MINREPCON 2018 is a short form and does not include many of the limitations and protections included in REPAIRCON 2018. The latest edition of this contract is MINREPCON 2018, issued in 2018.
Copyright in MINREPCON 2018 is held by BIMCO.
Sample copy of MINREPCON 2018Download now
The below explanatory notes for MINREPCON 2018 are also available as an e-book from Witherbys.
The explanatory notes for MINREPCON 2018 are available as an e-book from Witherbys.
In contrast to REPAIRCON which is the standard agreement for major ship repair works carried out at a contractors’ yard, MINREPCON is the recommended contract for minor works or maintenance. MINREPCON will typically be used for arrangements with a local plumber, electrician or carpenter to attend on board when a vessel is at berth or anchorage.
Local contractors’ own terms are often one-sided or fail to provide a clear apportionment of risk and responsibility. This can lead to difficulties and expose owners to unexpected liabilities in the event of an accident or where either party sustains loss or damage.
MINREPCON was first issued in 2002. In the light of experience and so as to encourage wider usage, the agreement has been revised and updated to provide users with a streamlined and more comprehensive document to meet contemporary requirements. Improvements include the introduction of a liability and limitation regime and modification of the dispute resolution mechanism replacing often problematic “local law” provisions with an agreed choice of law and jurisdiction. In addition, the previous right to exercise a lien over the vessel in the event of non-payment prior to sailing has been deleted leaving the issue to be determined on a case by case basis. However, late payment will attract interest.
BIMCO is grateful to the following Subcommittee members for their work in the development process:
The following Explanatory Notes provide background information to the structure and content of the contract. Owners should ensure that their P&I cover is adequate to respond to any accidents or incidents involving an outside contractor.
Part I follows the customary BIMCO box-layout style. The boxes are used to enter details of the main terms that the parties agree when the contract is concluded. As a matter of convenience the boxes, where appropriate, contain cross-references to the relevant clauses in Part II.
The date and place (which is likely to be the port) where the contract is agreed must be entered in this box.
The shipowners’ name, full postal address and contact details must be entered (Clause 1.1).
Owners must declare whether or not they are the bareboat charterers of the vessel. This distinction is made to ensure that the contractors are aware of any potential credit risks that may arise as a result of contracting repairs with a party other than the registered owners of the vessel.
The contractors’ name, full postal address and contact details must be entered (Clause 1.2).
The vessel’s full name must be entered and the required list of information completed (Clause 1.3).
Details of the contracted works are to be inserted (Clause 1.4).
The time and date when work is to begin must be inserted.
The stated completion date may be extended in the event of agreed “Additional Works” (Clause 1.9 and 2.14).
The guarantee period, to be agreed by the parties, must be entered (Clause 2.15).
The costs of labour must be set out covering both ordinary time and overtime together with the cost of materials and services (Clause 1.8).
This must indicate whether the agreed price is on a “Lump Sum”, “Time and Material” or “Combined” basis (Clause 1.7, 1.8 and 2.1).
This covers payment arrangements, the contractors’ bank details and interest in default of due payment (Clause 2.12).
The agreed law and court jurisdiction must be identified (Clause 2.17).
It is likely that the Master will sign the contract on behalf of the owners.
This sets out a list of terms that are used in the agreement.
Clause 2.1 Determines the basis of the of the contract price.
Clause 2.2 The contract represents the parties’ entire agreement. Any changes must be mutually agreed, in writing.
Clause 2.3 Sets the standards for the work which must be to “the reasonable satisfaction of the Master”.
Clause 2.4 The contractors are responsible for any sub-contractors who may be appointed subject to owners’ approval (which may not be unreasonably withheld).
Clause 2.5 Requires the contractors to undertake their work safely and comply with the vessel’s safety procedures.
Clause 2.6 In accordance with subclause (a), the contractors are responsible for loss or damage resulting from proved negligence or wilful misconduct. In order to deter false claims being made against the ship for contractors’ equipment, sub-clause (b) excludes owners’ responsibility for loss of or damage to contractors’ property.
Clause 2.7 A knock-for-knock liability regime applies in the event of death or personal injury with each party accepting responsibility for its own personnel and those for whom it is responsible. In addition to providing a clear allocation of responsibility, it is also intended to deter false claims being raised against the vessel and owners.
In line with other BIMCO contracts, which either exclude or are silent on the issue of wilful misconduct in the context of “knock for knock”, the issue is not addressed in MINREPCON. Current legal understanding is that, in the absence of clear wording to the contrary, “wilful misconduct” will fall outside the knock for knock regime. The parties are therefore likely to be responsible for wilful misconduct. However, a high threshold is likely to be set with wilful misconduct arising in the context of misdeeds of the directing mind or will of a company and not by the misbehaviour of a disaffected or deliberately careless employee.
Clause 2.8 The contractors’ liability is limited to a maximum of ten times the contract price unless otherwise agreed.
Clause 2.9 The right to limitation is balanced by the introduction of an obligation on the contractors to maintain insurance to meet their liabilities.
Clause 2.10 Subject to any agreed guarantee period (Clause 2.15), the contractors’ liability ceases when work has been completed.
Clause 2.11 Satisfactory completion of work must be agreed by the parties in writing.
Clause 2.12 Sets out the owners’ payment obligations. Late payment will attract interest at the rate stated in Box 11.
Clause 2.13 As long as it does not interfere with the contractors’ activities, owners may undertake their own work or operations.
Clause 2.14 Defective work is to be rectified by the contractors with the vessel’s Classification Society surveyor providing advice or an opinion in the event of dispute.
Clause 2.15 Where a guarantee period has been agreed, any remedial work is to be undertaken by the contractors or, if not feasible, elsewhere at their cost.
Clause 2.16 This is a standard provision.
Clause 2.17 Requires the parties to state their agreed choice of law and jurisdiction in Box 12.
The one-stop digital shop for all the standard maritime contracts and clauses you’ll ever need.
Subcommittee members Søren Berg, J. Lauritzen, Donald McLean, Lisnave & Donald Chard, BIMCO discuss and answer questions from the viewers regarding the newly revised REPAIRCON 2018 and MINREPCON 2018 forms in this webinar.
BIMCO has published a new charter party clause to help tackle potential abuse by sanctions busters of the Automatic Identification System (AIS) which is mandatory for all ships to use under regulations for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS).
You wouldn't navigate a ship without a chart, so why sign a contract without advice? Avoid unnecessary costs you couldn’t have foreseen.
The drafting committee that will carry out the first revision of the ASBATANKVOY form in 44 years has kicked off the major task to improve and update the widely used tanker charter party form.
A buyer’s payment instalments are at risk under a shipbuilding contract until the shipyard delivers the ship. To safeguard against the risk of the shipyard defaulting or becoming insolvent it is common practice to cover this risk with a refund guarantee issued by a bank. BIMCO’s Documentary Committee has adopted a clearly worded standalone refund guarantee that will assist parties in their shipbuilding projects.
BIMCO’s Documentary Committee has adopted a standard electronic signature clause that allows parties to safely use electronic signatures in their contractual arrangements.
BIMCO's Holiday Calendar covers general holidays in over 150 countries, plus local holidays and working hours in more than 680 ports around the world.
Access information on national, regional or port tariffs, taxes and charges.
For general guidance and information on cargo-related queries.